Press Releases

« Older Entries Newer Entries »

Labour MP attacks Government over ‘misuse’ of cancer statistics for own ends

Press Releases / November 8, 2011 / Comment now

Grahame Morris MP, a Member of the Health Select Committee, today attacked both the Prime Minister and his embattled Health Secretary Andrew Lansley for their attempts to do-down the NHS on cancer treatment. 

A recent study in the British Journal of Cancer by Professor Colin Pritchard and Dr Tamas Hickish has shown the NHS to be a world leader in cancer treatment and in efficient and effective cancer care relative to spend. The NHS was the most efficient of the 10 countries when considering GDP spent on healthcare across different countries.

Yet both the Prime Minister and the Health Secretary have both sought to use cancer outcomes as a reason to forward their own reform agenda for the NHS in England.

Grahame Morris said:

“It is disappointing that we have a Health Secretary who seems determined to talk down the NHS and undermine its achievements in order to get his own way on NHS reform in England.

“Andrew Lansley tried to hide the fact that public satisfaction with the NHS reached an all time high under Labour. He seems to be the only man in England that doesn’t like the NHS.  

“This report shows that for the money spent, the NHS achieves the most efficient and effective outcomes. We don’t need reckless reforms, but continued investment.

One of the report’s authors Prof Colin Pritchard, a health academic at Bournemouth University, said:

“This paper should be a real boost to cancer patients and their families because the NHS’s performance on cancer is much better than the media presents.

“It challenges the government’s assertion that the NHS is inefficient and ineffective at treating cancer – an argument for reforming the NHS.”

Local MP Grahame Morris Launches East Durham Credit Union

Press Releases / November 2, 2011 / Comment now

The primary aim of the Credit Union is to establish East Durham wide access to a community based low cost savings and loans club. This will be achieved through the development of at least 14 new collection points and by increasing Credit Union membership in East Durham by 600.

Establishing a credit union has required the recruitment and training of volunteers and identifying the need for additional collection points across the East Durham area.  Currently there are 4 collection points all in the South of the former Easington District area with more to follow.

Recognising the impact of debt on children and families our Credit Union will work with Secondary Schools and Colleges to promote money management amongst young people as well as developing links to preschool groups, surestart centres and primary schools across East Durham.

East Durham Area Action Partnership has secured funding for a dedicated Development Officer who will be based in East Durham Trust and East Durham Homes.

Grahame Morris MP at the Credit Union Launch

Grahame Morris MP at the Credit Union Launch

Grahame Morris MP showed his support by signing up to East Durham Credit Union, who have already signed up 250 members. Mr Morris praised the vital work of Credit Union’s in tackling the UK’s debt crisis:

 “Credit Unions are a vital facility to protect the UK’s three million poorest borrowers, who often have no option other than the high cost, short term credit market, pay day loan companies or illegal loan sharks. Interest rates charged by some unscrupulous pay day loan companies can be up to 3000 (three thousand) percent APR equivalent.

Britain’s interest repayments on personal debt were £67.8bn for the 12 months to May 2010. The average interest paid by each household on their total debt is approximately £2,692 each year. According to Price Waterhouse Coopers the average household will need to spend approximately 15% of net income purely to service the interest payments arising from this debt”.

High cost lending and debt affects certain groups of people disproportionately. Fair Finance, a social enterprise bank which offers loans and debt advice, has seen clear trends in those seeking its help. 75% of them are women, 70% are single mothers, 80% are on benefits, 60% are minorities and 75% are currently borrowing from expensive lenders.

Mr Morris added,

“I cannot overstate the importance of the East Durham Credit Union at this time when many families are struggling to make ends meet.

Weekly payment company, Buy As You View, charge an extortionate credit rate of 49.9%. Original sale prices are often inflated and customers on credit pay over the odds for household and electrical goods. They drive the poorest people into debt and poverty. It is vitally important people know that East Durham Credit Union is available, and is a better alternative than high cost, high credit stores.

High debt repayments have an immense effect on society, pushing people in to the inescapable cycle of debt and poverty with high debt repayments linked to a number of social ills including rent, council tax and utility arrears, poor diets, cold homes as well as increased mental health problems related to anxiety and depression.

I am delighted to launch this Credit Union project in East Durham”.

 

 

Ends

 

Notes to editor,

UK Debt Crisis

 

Total UK personal debt at the end of March 2010 stood at £1,460bn

 

Average household debt in the UK is £8,796 (excluding mortgages).

 

£181 Million of personal interest is paid in the UK daily

 

The UK’s poorest borrowers pay the highest price for credit in Europe.

 

Around 3 million people use the very high cost door to door or home credit lending market. This high cost market charges £82 in interest and collection charges for every £100 lent.

 

Other forms of high cost lending, such as Payday loans, which charge up to £35 per £100 lent, and recover monies directly from bank accounts, are expanding rapidly.

 

A million and a half more are indebted to payday lenders which have short-term loans with APR that often begins at 600% and can escalate to 2500% or more

 

Product comparisons

 

Samsung PS43D450

Buy As You View

Cash price £949.99

Credit Price £1650.48 (156 weeks at £10.58)

http://www.bayv.co.uk/content/products/tv-dvd-audio/televisions/samsung-43-plasma.ashx

 

Dixons

Cash price £349.00

http://www.dixons.co.uk/gbuk/samsung-ps43d450-43-hd-ready-plasma-tv-10078456-pdt.html

 

Hotpoint WDL540G 1400 Spin 7+5Kg

Buy As You View

Cash price £549.99

Credit price £956.26 (156 weeks at £6.13)

http://www.bayv.co.uk/content/products/kitchen-laundry/washing/hotpoint-7kg-washerdryer1.ashx

 

The Co-operative Electricals

Cash price £321.00 

http://www.coopelectricalshop.co.uk/Hotpoint-WDL540G/id-HOT-WDR-WDL540G-G

 

Nokia NOKIA 2220

Buy As You View

Cash price £129.99

Credit Price £162.24 (52 weeks at £3.12)

http://www.bayv.co.uk/content/products/phones/mobile-phones/nokia-sim-free-mobile1.ashx

 

T-Mobile

Cash price £29.99

http://www.t-mobile.co.uk/shop/pay-as-you-go/nokia-2220-slide-hot-pink/

Easington MP accuses Deputy PM of attack on democracy

Press Releases / October 11, 2011 / Comment now

Labour MP Grahame Morris used a question in the House of Commons to probe Nick Clegg on changing the electoral registration process. Currently the head of household is compelled to ensure all residents are registered to vote but government plans would see a move to individual electoral registration on a voluntary basis. 

Mr. Morris cited the Electoral Commission which has suggested voter registration could fall from over 90% now to around 65% if the government pushes ahead with the reform.

He went on to say:

“Ethnic minorities, young people and the urban poor will be disfranchised.

“Apart from gerrymandering the constituency boundaries, fixing the election timetable and now letting millions of people fall off the register, what else is he doing to let the Tories stay in power for a generation?”

The Deputy Prime Minister replied:

“We will now consider either the Electoral Commission’s variant or getting rid of the opt-out altogether. That is what I am saying, in a spirit of openness, that we are reflecting on, and that will be reflected in the final version of the legislation.”

However, it is thought that the Tory party would benefit significantly from allowing an opt-out and making voter registration voluntary.

Professor Iain McLean of Oxford University, told the Guardian in May 2010:

 “…to move straight to individual registration risks moving straight to mass disenfranchisement of the young, the urban, the mobile and ethnic minority voters.

“The rot dates back to Margaret Thatcher’s disastrous decision to make the electoral register a source of the poll tax register. It is also a source of jury lists. In the late 1980s, millions of people looked at the costs and benefits of being on the register, and rationally decided to disappear. They are not yet back, nor are their sons and daughters … At worst, a move to immediate individual registration could make Britain in 2011 like Florida in 2000.”

Grahame Morris MP shows support for bereaved Armed Forces families

Press Releases / September 22, 2011 / Comment now

Grahame Morris, MP for Easington, has attended an event at the House of Commons organised by The Royal British Legion to highlight the importance of supporting bereaved Armed Forces families.

At the event, Mr Morris was told about the Legion’s work to improve the welfare of the Armed Forces family in the local area. The MP also learnt more about the Legion’s concern that the Government should support bereaved Armed Forces families by appointing a Chief Coroner to improve investigations into deaths of Service personnel.

Grahame Morris & Andrew Drake

Grahame Morris MP with Andrew Drake, the Legion’s County Manager for Northumbria

Andrew Drake, the Legion’s County Manager for Northumbria said, “It was great to see Grahame Morris MP; we really appreciated him making the time to drop in. Many people don’t realise that we spend nearly £1.4 million a week on helping both the serving and the ex-Service communities, including their families, so we were delighted to tell him about the range of services we provide. The Legion is currently celebrating its 90th Anniversary Year, and campaigning for the Armed Forces family is as important to us now as it was in 1921. Our main campaign at the moment is calling on the Government to do all they possibly can for bereaved Armed Forces families, specifically by appointing a Chief Coroner to spearhead reform of the inquest system.”

Grahame Morris MP said, “I was really pleased to see my local County Manager and tell him that just as the Legion supports bereaved Armed Forces families, so do I. The Legion does very important welfare work for some of my most vulnerable constituents in both the serving and ex-Service communities. It is vital that we, as a nation, are there for those serving in current conflicts, and especially for the families of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice. I was grateful for the opportunity to learn more about how, in its 90th anniversary year, the Legion stands shoulder to shoulder with all who Serve, including bereaved Armed Forces families. They deserve as much support as we can give them”. 

ENDS 

For further information, please contact:

Andrew Drake

County Manager 

The Royal British Legion Northumbria

0191 495 9512

adrake@britishlegion.org.uk

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Royal British Legion is the nation’s leading Armed Forces charity providing care and support to all members of the British Armed Forces past and present and their families. It is also the national Custodian of Remembrance and safeguards the Military Covenant between the nation and its Armed Forces. It is best known for the annual Poppy Appeal and its emblem the red poppy — www.britishlegion.org.uk.

During the event, Grahame Morris MP was photographed with Andrew Drake, the Legion’s County Manager for Northumbria. The event was held at the House of Commons on Wednesday 7th September 2011.

A North South Divide in Cancer Treatments

Press Releases / September 8, 2011 / Comment now

A new report published by the Department of Health in collaboration with the National Cancer Action Team has revealed a dangerous lack of cancer treatment available for North East patients.

The Radiotherapy Data Set Annual Report figures show that cancer patients in the North of England receive the lowest level of cancer treatment despite having the seventh highest level of new diagnosed cancer cases. The North East is currently ranked 28th of 28.

In comparison, north-west London has the lowest cancer rate but the highest level of radiotherapy followed by Surrey, West Sussex and Hampshire.

The report’s concludes that cancer residents in the North of England have a lower than average access to radiotherapy services than other parts of the country.

Grahame Morris, MP for Easington and House of Commons Health Select Committee Member has called on the Government to take urgent action to address growing health inequities in the region.

“The latest report from the Department of Health highlights the widening North-South divide for cancer patients’ access to treatment

 This postcode lottery across England for cancer treatment is risking the lives and health of cancer patients’ in the North East

The Government need to address the issues that are prohibiting equal access to cancer treatment across England and halt their transfer of resources from the North to the South”

A recent document produced by Public Health Manchester showed that the North East were set to lose £100m in funding to tackle health inequalities while Surrey gain £61.4m, Hampshire £52m and Hertfordshire £39.7m.

Mr Morris added

“The Government needs to invest in radiotherapy equipment in the North instead of cutting funding at a time while health inequalities are so prevalent in the region.

 Grahame Morris has written to Simon Burns, Secretary of State for Health calling for the Government to invest in radiotherapy equipment to address the North East’s cancer injustice.

 

ENDS

Disabled set to lose out over under-occupancy Welfare Reforms

Press Releases / September 7, 2011 / 1 Comment

Today the Prime Minister was questioned by Labour MP Grahame Morris about the government’s planned cuts to housing benefit due to under-occupancy.

Controversial changes to the benefits system which are contained in the Welfare Reform Bill currently going through Parliament will affect 450,000 disabled people, including 33,000 disabled people in the North East. They stand to lose an average of £676 a year simply for having a spare bedroom. The Department of Work and Pensions has suggested that those people affected by housing benefit cuts due to under-occupancy, could take in a lodger to help to pay the bills.

Grahame Morris said:

“The Prime Minister has consistently promised to protect the most vulnerable from government cuts and yet disabled people are to be amongst the biggest losers from Tory-led welfare reforms. Changes contained in the Welfare Reform Bill could force disabled people out of their homes simply for having a spare bedroom. ”

In total 670,000 claimants are expected to be affected, of which 450,000 (66%) are disabled. Many social homes are adapted to be accessible for people with disabilities and research by the National Housing Federation has found an estimated 100,000 working-age social housing tenants in the UK claiming housing benefit live in adapted homes with one or more ‘spare’ bedrooms.

The NHF has also said putting personalised adaptations into new smaller properties will be costly estimating the average cost of the relevant grant for this work at £6,500 saying:

“Failure to exempt disabled people living in an adapted property from this measure may therefore lead to a net cost for the taxpayer. The Government must ensure that appropriate exemptions are put in place.”

 ENDS

Tory-led Government shifting NHS money from the North East to better-off areas

Press Releases / August 1, 2011 / Comment now

A previously unpublished report reveals that the Tory-led Government is shifting NHS funding from the North East region to better-off areas.

The document, produced by Public Health Manchester for the Health Select Committee and obtained by Labour’s Debbie Abrahams MP, assesses the long-term impact of the Tory-led Government’s decision to change the way in which money is allocated to Primary Care Trusts so that it gives less weighting to health inequalities.

The figures show that Health Trusts across the North East face a £100m decrease in the money they receive based on their need to tackle health inequalities in 2011-2012. According to the analysis, the biggest losers in the region will be County Durham with a £26m reduction in funding. Hartlepool loses £5.4m, Middlesbrough loses £7.9m, Sunderland £14.9m and Newcastle £12.3m.

Meanwhile parts of the South of England look set to gain, with Surrey gaining £61.4m, Hampshire gaining £52m, Oxfordshire gain £22.1m and Hertfordshire will receive an extra £39.7m from the government.

Labour’s Shadow Health Secretary John Healey said:

“These shocking figures reveal that the Tories’ plans for the NHS will make inequality worse, not better. They are reducing funding to tackle poor health in the least healthy parts of the country, and shifting it to better off, healthier areas.”

Grahame Morris, Labour’s MP for Easington and a member of the House of Commons Health Select Committee said:

“This is yet more evidence that the Tory-led Government’s NHS plans are bad for people in the North East.  

“Less well-off areas like County Durham will be among the biggest losers – losing £26 million to areas like Hertfordshire, Hampshire and Surrey. It makes absolutely no sense to do this. We already suffer from some of the highest levels of health inequalities when compared to the South of England.

“I have written to the Health Minister to seek an urgent meeting about the impact on health services in the North East”

“The Tory plans will hit services that help people stop smoking, promote healthy eating and exercise, and raise awareness about the risks of sexually transmitted diseases. They will make it harder to prevent the big killers like heart disease and cancer, and increase the costs of poor health for everyone in the long run.”

“It just reaffirms the message that our NHS is not safe in this Tory-led government’s hands.”

ENDS

Notes to editors

·        The Government has reduced the weighting for health inequalities in the PCT allocation formulae for 2011/12 from 15% to 10%. The rate at which PCTs move towards these allocation targets is determined under “pace of change” rules.

·        The figures are taken from a memorandum from Public Health Manchester, Manchester City Council and NHS Manchester to the Health Select Committee – full table below. Selected quotes:

“This [change in the PCT allocation formulae] results, other things being equal, in a shift in both target and actual allocations from poor health PCTs to good health PCTs.  The effect on target allocations ranges from a 4.1 % reduction for Tower Hamlets PCT to a 4.2% increase for Surrey PCT.”

“The reduction of the health inequalities weighting is a ministerial judgment rather than an evidence based recommendation from the Advisory Committee on Resource Allocation. In fact the decision seems to contradict evidence from the recent DH-commissioned research on the subject.”

“This change could be interpreted as a reduction in the priority of tackling health inequalities and could be seen as contradicting the aspirations described in the recent White Papers, particularly in view of currently worsening health inequalities.”

photo

Effect on 2011/12 PCT and SHA closing target allocations of changing the health inequalities weight from 15% to 10% in order of size and direction of effect.

PCT 2011-12 closing  target DFLE at 15% 2011-12 closing  target DFLE at 10% change  £ 000’s change % Spearhead = S
Tower Hamlets PCT

455,390

436,705

-18,686

-4.1

S
Manchester PCT

1,032,222

990,556

-41,666

-4.0

S
Newham PCT

494,707

476,702

-18,005

-3.6

S
Liverpool PCT

964,224

930,913

-33,311

-3.5

S
City and Hackney Teaching PCT

477,582

461,698

-15,884

-3.3

S
Nottingham City PCT

566,335

547,970

-18,365

-3.2

S
Knowsley PCT

326,808

316,621

-10,187

-3.1

S
Barnsley PCT

473,915

459,219

-14,696

-3.1

S
Hartlepool PCT

181,862

176,393

-5,469

-3.0

S
Middlesbrough PCT

283,946

275,970

-7,976

-2.8

S
Sunderland Teaching PCT

550,752

535,753

-14,999

-2.7

S
Islington PCT

391,822

381,239

-10,583

-2.7

S
Stoke On Trent PCT

528,026

513,873

-14,153

-2.7

S
Hull Teaching PCT

511,249

498,006

-13,243

-2.6

S
Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Care Trust Plus

283,680

276,333

-7,347

-2.6

S
County Durham PCT

1,008,739

982,640

-26,100

-2.6

S
Salford PCT

470,780

458,809

-11,971

-2.5

S
Halton and St Helens PCT

596,778

581,645

-15,133

-2.5

S
Newcastle PCT

490,132

477,756

-12,375

-2.5

S
Leicester City PCT

559,216

545,454

-13,762

-2.5

S
Barking and Dagenham PCT

325,038

317,045

-7,993

-2.5

S
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT

574,171

560,130

-14,040

-2.4

S
Heart of Birmingham Teaching PCT

506,630

494,779

-11,850

-2.3

S
Wakefield District PCT

637,533

622,711

-14,822

-2.3

S
Doncaster PCT

559,051

546,522

-12,529

-2.2

S
Rotherham PCT

457,606

447,457

-10,149

-2.2

S
Gateshead PCT

379,262

370,983

-8,279

-2.2

S
Blackpool PCT

289,123

282,861

-6,262

-2.2

S
South Birmingham PCT

624,444

610,953

-13,491

-2.2

S
Sandwell PCT

582,831

570,683

-12,147

-2.1

S
Oldham PCT

409,068

400,865

-8,203

-2.0

S
Birmingham East and North PCT

729,973

715,352

-14,620

-2.0

S
Redcar and Cleveland PCT

248,879

243,936

-4,943

-2.0

S
South Tyneside PCT

297,044

291,253

-5,792

-1.9

S
Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT1

390,103

382,574

-7,529

-1.9

S
Lambeth PCT

578,489

568,128

-10,361

-1.8

S
Bolton PCT

489,187

480,663

-8,524

-1.7

S
Stockton-On-Tees Teaching PCT

324,506

318,915

-5,591

-1.7

S
Tameside and Glossop PCT

420,446

413,495

-6,951

-1.7

S
Wolverhampton City PCT

445,995

438,759

-7,236

-1.6

S
Bassetlaw PCT

196,134

192,986

-3,148

-1.6

S
East Lancashire Teaching PCT

670,273

659,640

-10,633

-1.6

S
Waltham Forest PCT

413,219

406,665

-6,554

-1.6

 
Sheffield PCT

934,232

919,990

-14,241

-1.5

 
Bradford and Airedale Teaching PCT

875,399

862,603

-12,796

-1.5

S
Camden PCT

419,825

413,793

-6,033

-1.4

 
Greenwich Teaching PCT

435,325

429,071

-6,254

-1.4

S
Southwark PCT

531,501

524,054

-7,447

-1.4

S
Haringey Teaching PCT

451,588

445,361

-6,226

-1.4

S
Plymouth Teaching PCT

445,730

439,716

-6,014

-1.3

 
Coventry Teaching PCT

557,505

550,240

-7,265

-1.3

S
North Tyneside PCT

368,504

363,754

-4,750

-1.3

S
Walsall Teaching PCT

455,761

450,067

-5,694

-1.2

S
Telford and Wrekin PCT

263,903

260,620

-3,283

-1.2

 
Wirral PCT

584,865

577,710

-7,156

-1.2

S
Lewisham PCT

485,923

480,240

-5,684

-1.2

S
Darlington PCT

177,558

175,700

-1,858

-1.0

 
Derby City PCT

463,818

459,056

-4,761

-1.0

 
Southampton City PCT

402,651

398,917

-3,734

-0.9

 
Bury PCT

313,930

311,068

-2,862

-0.9

S
Central Lancashire PCT

747,786

741,012

-6,774

-0.9

S
Bristol PCT

734,214

727,571

-6,643

-0.9

 
Sefton PCT

494,331

490,102

-4,229

-0.9

 
Leeds PCT

1,268,038

1,257,231

-10,807

-0.9

 
Wandsworth PCT

475,586

471,694

-3,893

-0.8

 
Kirklees PCT

654,232

648,880

-5,351

-0.8

 
Warrington PCT

317,241

314,988

-2,252

-0.7

S
Luton PCT

313,044

310,825

-2,220

-0.7

 
Hounslow PCT

379,225

376,860

-2,365

-0.6

 
Derbyshire County PCT

1,180,387

1,173,064

-7,323

-0.6

S
North East Lincolnshire Care Trust Plus

273,456

271,926

-1,530

-0.6

S
North Staffordshire PCT

349,456

347,532

-1,924

-0.6

 
Portsmouth City Teaching PCT

334,602

332,800

-1,802

-0.5

 
Northumberland Care Trust

546,206

543,612

-2,594

-0.5

S
Calderdale PCT

328,324

326,858

-1,466

-0.4

 
Ealing PCT

541,063

538,726

-2,337

-0.4

 
Hammersmith and Fulham PCT

283,611

282,424

-1,187

-0.4

S
North Lincolnshire PCT

265,585

264,510

-1,075

-0.4

 
Peterborough PCT

256,304

255,300

-1,005

-0.4

 
Nottinghamshire County Teaching PCT

1,061,627

1,057,660

-3,967

-0.4

 
Brighton and Hove City PCT

434,846

433,431

-1,415

-0.3

 
Dudley PCT

505,092

503,967

-1,125

-0.2

 
Milton Keynes PCT

356,110

355,396

-714

-0.2

 
Brent Teaching PCT

461,756

460,931

-824

-0.2

 
Medway PCT

420,430

419,699

-731

-0.2

 
North Lancashire Teaching PCT

558,876

558,331

-544

-0.1

 
Redbridge PCT

403,086

402,814

-272

-0.1

 
South Staffordshire PCT

937,099

937,972

873

0.1

S
Cumbria Teaching PCT

848,757

849,863

1,106

0.1

S
Eastern and Coastal Kent PCT

1,220,609

1,223,486

2,877

0.2

 
Trafford PCT

333,460

334,374

914

0.3

 
Torbay Care Trust

254,069

254,842

773

0.3

 
Cornwall and Isles of Scilly PCT

890,382

893,157

2,774

0.3

 
Enfield PCT

465,462

467,119

1,657

0.4

 
Western Cheshire PCT

383,477

384,935

1,458

0.4

 
Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT

395,295

397,056

1,761

0.4

 
Hastings and Rother PCT

315,054

316,482

1,428

0.5

 
Lincolnshire Teaching PCT

1,167,262

1,172,760

5,498

0.5

S
South West Essex PCT

651,924

655,234

3,310

0.5

 
Swindon PCT

306,200

307,790

1,589

0.5

 
Stockport PCT

452,132

454,813

2,682

0.6

 
North East Essex PCT

545,308

549,092

3,785

0.7

 
Croydon PCT

550,110

554,098

3,987

0.7

 
Isle of Wight NHS PCT

249,794

251,924

2,130

0.9

 
Hillingdon PCT

387,903

391,328

3,425

0.9

 
Northamptonshire Teaching PCT

993,778

1,002,588

8,810

0.9

S
Warwickshire PCT

791,591

799,405

7,814

1.0

 
Central and Eastern Cheshire PCT

678,375

686,186

7,811

1.2

 
Bournemouth and Poole Teaching PCT

540,122

546,382

6,261

1.2

 
Westminster PCT

401,950

406,690

4,739

1.2

 
East Riding of Yorkshire PCT

479,118

484,854

5,736

1.2

 
Havering PCT

399,134

404,239

5,105

1.3

 
Worcestershire PCT

825,802

836,819

11,017

1.3

 
Norfolk PCT

1,183,973

1,199,868

15,895

1.3

 
Shropshire County PCT

448,556

454,695

6,139

1.4

 
South East Essex PCT

541,503

549,050

7,547

1.4

 
Sutton and Merton PCT

542,089

550,775

8,687

1.6

 
Herefordshire PCT

277,961

282,532

4,571

1.6

 
Bexley Care Trust

337,933

343,694

5,760

1.7

 
North Yorkshire and York PCT

1,148,405

1,168,061

19,656

1.7

 
Somerset PCT

808,322

822,363

14,041

1.7

 
Bedfordshire PCT

599,545

609,973

10,429

1.7

 
North Somerset PCT

331,603

337,374

5,771

1.7

 
Harrow PCT

318,404

323,946

5,542

1.7

 
Devon PCT

1,143,276

1,163,880

20,604

1.8

 
Leicestershire County and Rutland PCT

909,896

926,923

17,027

1.9

 
Solihull Care Trust

308,340

314,131

5,791

1.9

 
Barnet PCT

518,400

528,707

10,308

2.0

 
Berkshire East PCT

552,695

564,146

11,451

2.1

 
Gloucestershire PCT

858,348

876,170

17,822

2.1

 
Cambridgeshire PCT

827,760

845,135

17,376

2.1

 
West Essex PCT

401,746

410,215

8,469

2.1

 
South Gloucestershire PCT

337,127

344,447

7,321

2.2

 
Suffolk PCT

894,754

914,905

20,151

2.3

 
East Sussex Downs and Weald PCT

523,146

535,373

12,228

2.3

 
West Kent PCT

979,855

1,003,072

23,217

2.4

 
Mid Essex PCT

504,893

517,027

12,134

2.4

 
Hertfordshire PCT

1,580,966

1,620,676

39,710

2.5

 
Bath and North East Somerset PCT

254,080

260,750

6,670

2.6

 
Kingston PCT

238,715

244,995

6,280

2.6

 
Oxfordshire PCT

834,186

856,236

22,050

2.6

 
West Sussex PCT

1,202,872

1,235,203

32,331

2.7

 
Dorset PCT

610,886

627,561

16,675

2.7

 
Wiltshire PCT

641,699

659,332

17,633

2.7

 
Hampshire PCT

1,811,303

1,863,354

52,050

2.9

 
Bromley PCT

460,892

474,201

13,309

2.9

 
Berkshire West PCT

616,447

634,407

17,960

2.9

 
Buckinghamshire PCT

673,976

698,513

24,537

3.6

 
Richmond and Twickenham PCT

234,717

243,677

8,960

3.8

 
Kensington and Chelsea PCT

285,613

296,800

11,187

3.9

 
Surrey PCT

1,477,334

1,538,711

61,377

4.2

 
           
England

84,996,081

84,996,081

0

0.0

 
           
SHA          
North East SHA

4,857,390

4,756,665

-100,725

-2.1

 
North West SHA

12,630,092

12,438,489

-191,603

-1.5

 
Yorkshire and the Humber SHA

8,866,143

8,778,827

-87,315

-1.0

 
East Midlands SHA

7,098,452

7,078,462

-19,991

-0.3

 
West Midlands SHA

9,138,964

9,082,381

-56,582

-0.6

 
East of England SHA

8,697,015

8,834,356

137,342

1.6

 
London SHA

13,146,060

13,104,418

-41,642

-0.3

 
South East Coast SHA

6,574,146

6,705,458

131,312

2.0

 
South Central SHA

5,831,764

5,955,692

123,928

2.1

 
South West SHA

8,156,058

8,261,334

105,276

1.3

 
           
North

42,591,040

42,134,824

-456,216

-1.1

 
South

42,405,042

42,861,258

456,216

1.1

 

 

Source: Public Health Manchester analysis of DH exposition book

Grahame Morris MP joins Age UK Lobby in Parliament against ‘moving the goal posts’ for state pension changes

Press Releases / May 18, 2011 / 2 Comments

500,000 women forced to wait more than a year for their pension

Age UK staged a lobby of Parliament to campaign against the acceleration of equalising and increasing the state pension age for men and women.

The Government’s plans to accelerate the state pension age increases mean that 500,000 women will have to wait for more than a year longer before receiving the state pension, leaving many women aged 56 and 57 feeling robbed.

300,000 women born between 6 December 1953 and 5 October 1954, will have to wait an extra 18 months, and an unlucky 33,000 born between 6 March 1954 and 5 April 1954 will have to wait an extra 2 years, before being entitled to their state pension.

The majority of these women will already be well underway in their plans for retirement, with many already working reduced hours in order to care for grandchildren or elderly parents.  Yet they are now being forced to make significant changes to their financial plans, with just 5 years notice before the changes kick in. 

The unlucky 33,000 born between 6 March 1954 and 5 April 1954 are set to lose around £10,000 in lost state pension or more than £15,000 if they get the full pension credit, with less than 7 years to attempt to accommodate the change.

Grahame Morris MP, said

“The Government’s plans to increase the state pension age disproportionately affects women, and 1,000 women in the Easington Constituency are being made to wait up to two years longer for their state pension. 

“Many of these are women who have juggled working lives with raising a family, and who have very little retirement savings to fall back on. 

“The lack of warning of these changes means they do not have enough time to adjust carefully thought-out retirement plans and leaves them feeling robbed of their pensions.

Labour’s Shadow Pensions Minister, Rachel Reeves MP said

“Despite the Coalition Agreement stating that they would not raise the state pension age for women before 2020, the government have taken another ‘u-turn’ on their policy and I will be fighting these changes every step of the way to ensure fairness for those approaching retirement feeling that the goalposts keep being moved.”

ENDS

Coalition plans to publish prescribing data would put patient confidentiality at risk for the benefit of pharmaceutical companies

Press Releases / April 26, 2011 / 1 Comment

Plans to publish patient prescribing data at practice level were subject to a consultation by the NHS Information Centre just two years ago. At that time the proposal was ruled to be inappropriate and not permitted.

However, two years on, the coalition has stated its aim to open up prescribing data for commercial use by pharmaceutical companies. The Plan for Growth, published by the coalition last month, reveals that the government “will look to publish practice level prescribing data subject to another evaluation and impact assessment by the NHS Information Centre” [para 2.200 Opening up prescribing data].

The Patients Association is amongst a number of health organisations which have serious concerns about the proposal. If implemented there would be a significant risk of misinterpretation and misuse of this raw and sensitive data. There is also wide concern over the potential damage to medical research which relies on pseudonymised patient databases.  

The greatest concern will be for patient confidentiality which would be placed at significant risk for the sake of commercial gain by the pharmaceutical industry.

Grahame Morris MP at a blood donation service

Grahame Morris MP at a blood donation service

Grahame Morris MP, Member of the Health Select Committee, commented:

“It seems there is nothing that cannot be commercialised or sold off in Andrew Lansley’s NHS.

“Selling off this most sensitive information would be a breach of trust with patients in the NHS. It would at best cause additional anxiety and worry for patients and at worst allow the identification of a patient’s personal prescription by the linkage of numerous databases.

“If Andrew Lansley allows this to go ahead, he will undeniably have put profits before patients. It is no way for the Secretary of State for Health to behave.

“Last month we heard about plans to privatise the National Blood Service. Where will the line be drawn between public services and private profit?”

NHS Reforms face new cross party criticism by Commons Health Select Committee

Press Releases / April 5, 2011 / Comment now

The Health Select Committee has today published a report on Commissioning in the NHS which calls for further significant changes to be made to Andrew Lansley’s Health and Social Care Bill currently going through Parliament.

The Committee’s Report calls for GP commissioning groups to become Commissioning Authorities which have greater clinical representation as well as democratically elected board members. It also criticises the lack of accountability for the proposed GP commissioning groups and calls for greater powers to hold commissioners to account.

The report also calls for an identifiable Chief Executive and Finance Director to be full board members of any Commissioning Authority as well as an independent Chair appointed by the NHS Commissioning Board.

Member of the Health Select Committee, Grahame Morris MP, said:

“It is significant that the committee, which has a Tory majority and a former Tory Health Secretary as Chairman, has called for such significant changes to be made to the government’s flagship NHS reforms.

“Labour members have worked hard to argue the case for a publicly funded publicly provided integrated NHS.

“I remain concerned about the role of Monitor as the new NHS economic regulator, the wholesale introduction of competition and the unrestricted access for private health companies that potentially could displace NHS providers.

“Although I welcome the committee’s strong critical response to government plans, the only option for David Cameron is to drop the Bill and seek a cross-part consensus for reform.

“The government’s reputation on the NHS has already been severely damaged and it is now time to respond to the sustained public outcry.

“Although the committee’s proposals would improve the Bill they do not change the fundamental failure of the Bill to protect the NHS from privatisation by stealth.”

« Older Entries Newer Entries »

In Your Area

Highlighted events

    No events to show

Search

Grahame Morris on Facebook
Contact us Comments policy Terms of use Website by Dan Sheldon Labour Grahame Morris for Easington